Webster defines a pet as "a domesticated animal kept for pleasure rather than utility." So why does the reptile community have such an issue with the word "pet"?
Me, I have an issue with using the word "collections" to describe our animals. I collect comic books, but my reptiles are my pets. I provide their daily needs -- food, water and a clean enclosure. I give them enrichment items and interact with them daily. I keep them because they give me pleasure.
That doesn't change because breeding them and making money doing it; you are still gaining pleasure from those animals that you are raising in your home. You gain personal joy from doing it, you network with others keeping reptiles, and you build our community.
Before you complain our animals are not domesticated, check again. According to
Webster, our reptiles are in fact domesticated. Domesticate: "To adapt (an animal or plant) to life in intimate association with and to the advantage of humans."
So tell me, why is saying you have a "pet snake" so wrong?
Also the use of the word pet changes how those outside the community look upon us and our pets. It is all in how we say it as much as what we say.
Number one is that these are animals that are not emotionally dependent on humans in the same way some other pets--dogs, cats, horses and most larger pet birds--are, and people like myself who find that an attractive quality, call it self-sufficiency, wildness, what have you--tend to feel the animal is being downplayed or belittled in some way by calling it a "pet." That's a silly, irrational way to think, but we all have our flaws.
Number two: a lot of us have seen people engage in stupid, reckless behavior that gets innocent people hurt or at least badly scared, and damages our hobby in an increasingly restrictive society. Inevitably the people behaving like such fools use some defense like "he's my pet, just like a dog" after they've created a situation where their animal has been frightened into biting or simply given some poor old lady a fainting spell, and thus a lot of herpers want to disassociate themselves from such a stereotype.
What it comes down to, though, is what sounds least affected and closest to the truth...and I guess, until a new word is invented, I'd follow your lead, Cindy. "Pets" says basically what needs to be said.
Anyway, the problem I have with "collection" is it takes the living being part of the snake out of it. Nobody would say they have a "collection" of puppies if they were a dog breeder. I just find it offensive in a weird way. I only purchase snakes from smaller breeders who name their snakes (rainbows-r-us, local breeders, etc.) and aren't just running thousands of snakes breeding at once (though i understand why they are doing it, and love how they push the community)
The collection word to me, seems to place snakes into the same realm as a collection of guitars or clothes or something, and I don't think its alright to look at them as a commodity or collectible thing rather than an animal.
anyway, that's my rant. take it how you will.
Hobbyists have collections, almost everyone else has pets.
To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.